click to search
 LPS Blogs List
 
  
 Blog info

FischBowl  
Arapahoe High School

English Independent 
Heritage High School

Powell News
Powell MS

Period Seven
Goddard MS

Newton IB 
Newton MS

Lenski Wiki 
Lenski Elementary

AHS Medicine
Zero hour class

Dan Maas, President  
CASE

LPS Tech  
Technology Research

 
  
 Search LPS Blogs
 
  
 LPS Blog Archive
 
  
 Blog
May16

Written by:Maas Dan
5/16/2007 

 

At the end of the legislative session, a number of bills I've been involved with were passed.  HB 1270 calls for an audit of the data technology systems and procedures at CDE.  HB 1320 calls for a data dictionary to be created at CDE and the establishment of appropriate windows for changes to the data collections.  Both bills were passed and will be funded for 07-08.

I am hopeful that the audit will reveal what many of us have known for years.  The methods for data collection at CDE are diverse, duplicative and overly burdensome on the school districts.  There are significant ways to improve the method of sending data to CDE and I'd expect any data audit will reveal this to be true.

The data dictionary will require CDE to keep a complete list of all the data they have and collect in a single document.  This will allow them to identify where they are duplicating reporting and help them avoid perpetuating the problems we experience today.

Finally, HB 1320 calls for the establishment of two 90-day windows for changes in data collections.  The first 90-day window is for CDE and the State Board of Education to work through any changes pushed to them by the Legislature, the US Department of Education or any other source.  Subsequently, when the new data collection formats/procedures are established, the school districts (and our software vendors) shall have another 90-day window to comply with the new format or methodology.  Gone will be the days when we get notified that we have to collect new data ten days before a collection due date!

All of these are back-office issues and hard to get people excited about.  So explain to me why HB 1320 had 26 co-sponsoring members of the House of Representatives?  I can't, but I'm glad it happened!  With the prospect of streamlining our data reporting, I am looking forward to the day when I can repurpose some of our database management resources away from bureaucratic reporting to serving teachers and learning.  Imagine that [;-)

Tags:

4 comment(s) so far...

Re: HB 1270 and 1320

Who's doing the audit?

By Karl Fisch on   5/16/2007

Re: HB 1270 and 1320

The audit will be carried out by the Department of IT under the Governor's Office. The funding for the audit will come from the audit fund that CDE has from collecting from school districts that make mistakes in their student counts, etc.

By Dan Maas on   5/16/2007

Re: HB 1270 and 1320

Dan,
Are current data models and/or data definitions used by CDE currently available publicly?

Would outsourced services or application used by CDE need to have their data models included in the new required documentation?

By Brook on   5/31/2007

Re: HB 1270 and 1320

Yes, CASE compiled over 500 field definitions and formats in their review of statute. CDE does not have a compilation which would be more authoritative. I'm not sure if CASE has this file posted on their web site at www.co-case.org.

CDE has 26 different databases in use. There are reasons for the data they collect many of which are tied to federal reports which is why, without concerted leadership on the topic of data, the organization has developed such a diverse and confusing landscpe of information. My hope for this legislation is to influence change that will cause a more systemic look at how data is collected, analyzed and reported at the state level. Whether any given strategy, like outsourcing, is the right answer would be the product of the work ot come.

By dmaas on   5/31/2007

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel